|
But on the other hand, imagine that
this fatal principle has been introduced: Under the pretense of
organization, regulation, protection, or encouragement, the law
takes property from one person and gives it to another; the law
takes the wealth of all and gives it to a fewwhether
farmers, manufacturers, shipowners, artists, or comedians. Under
these circumstances, then certainly every class will aspire to
grasp the law, and logically so.
The excluded classes will
furiously demand their right to vote and will overthrow
society rather than not to obtain it. Even beggars and vagabonds
will then prove to you that they also have an incontestable title
to vote. They will say to you:
"We cannot buy wine, tobacco,
or salt without paying the tax. And a part of the tax that we pay
is given by lawin privileges and subsidiesto men who
are richer than we are. Others use the law to raise the prices of
bread, meat, iron, or cloth. Thus, since everyone else uses the
law for his own profit, we also would like to use the law for our
own profit. We demand from the law the right to relief, which is
the poor mans plunder. To obtain this right, we also should
be voters and legislators in order that we may organize Beggary
on a grand scale for our own class, as you have organized
Protection on a grand scale for your class. Now dont tell
us beggars that you will act for us, and then toss us, as Mr.
Mimerel proposes, 600,000 francs to keep us quiet, like throwing
us a bone to gnaw. We have other claims. And anyway, we wish to
bargain for ourselves as other classes have bargained for
themselves!" And what can you say to answer that argument!
Clark Simmons, Webmaster
Copyright© 2000, The XLData Net |